back against his desired UVA has a "rape culture" narrative. People thought Balzie exposed himself with his poor behavior towards other posters, but no one that had been on this board was the least bit surprised. It's what he's always done, it's what he did for all to see then, it's what he still does to this day, and it's what he's doing here with that post.

He's offering nothing to support his desired narrative that Mr. Bobulinski is not believable. Because he knows he has nothing. And probably can't be bothered to even watch that interview last night to dare challenge his desired narrative. So instead he childishly throws out a post about believing Trump, Rudy, Barr, etc., as if that has any relevance whatsoever to whether or not Mr. Bobulinski is believable or not. All in hopes of pushing his laughable desired narrative that this is still just Russian Disinformation, or simply to persuade his fellow sheeple that none of this should be believed simply because he says so, all evidence Mr. Bobulinski has brought forth and his interview to the contrary.

There is nothing wrong with being wrong. Many were to different degrees when the Jackie story came out. A decent human recognizes his mistakes, apologizes to those he treated badly based on his wrong assumptions (I wasn't one of those for the Jackie story BTW), and tries to avoid the same poor behavior going forward. He doesn't do any of that. And he continues the same poor behavior here regularly to this day. Instead he wants to try and revise history, and ignore or pretend that poor behavior we all saw never happened. Just as he's doing below. He was one of the first to doubt the story? As if even if that were a true and fair depiction of what he said there, that somehow excused his behavior. Give me a fucking break.